1 Definitions
- 1.1 Mental disorder
- 1.2 Consent
- 2.1 Patients to whom Part 4 applies
- 2.2 Section 63: general position
- 2.3 Section 57: treatment requiring consent and a second opinion
- 2.4 Section 58: treatment requiring consent or a second opinion
- 2.5 Section 58A: electro-convulsive therapy
- 2.6 Section 62: urgent treatment
- 3.1 Overview of Part 4A
- 3.2 Adults
- 3.3 Children
- 3.4 Treatment following recall or revocation
Definitions
Mental disorder
Consent
Consent is considered in the Code of Practice, chapter 24, including the following:
34.24 Consent is the voluntary and continuing permission of a patient to be given a particular treatment, based on a sufficient knowledge of the purpose, nature, likely effects and risks of that treatment, including the likelihood of its success and any alternatives to it. Permission given under any unfair or undue pressure is not consent.
34.35 By definition, a person who lacks capacity is unable to consent or refuse treatment, even if they co-operate with the treatment or actively seek it.
Part 4
Patients to whom Part 4 applies
Section 57 applies to all patients, whether detained or not.
The remainder of Part 4 applies to patients subject to:
- Civil detention: s2 and s3
- s36, s38, s44, s51(5)
- s37 and equivalent (s37/41, s45A, s47, s47/49, s48, s48/49 MHA; s5 CPIA)
But not to patients subject to:
- s4 (until converted to s2)
- s5(2) or s5(4)
- s7 or s37 guardianship
- s35 (remand to hospital for reports)
- s135 or s136
- ‘place of safety’ provisions in s37(4) or s45A(5)
- conditional discharge (until recalled)
- CTO (until recalled)
Section 58A applies to the above patients, plus all children under 18 (including children on a CTO who have been recalled).
Section 63: general position
When the Part 4 compulsory treatment provisions do not apply, it makes no difference if the patient is subject to the MHA or not. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 may apply instead or as well.
When Part 4 MHA does apply (s63):
The consent of a patient shall not be required for any medical treatment given to him for the mental disorder from which he is suffering … if the treatment is given by or under the direction of the approved clinician in charge of the treatment.
This is subject to ss57, 58 and s58A, which contain special safeguards for certain treatments. The most common one is s58: medication may be given for three months, after which a SOAD is required.
However, the special safeguards can be overridden in certain urgent circumstances or where discontinuance would cause serious suffering (s62).
Questions of capacity ought to be determined by reference to the principles in the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Often the capacity in question relates to understanding ‘the nature, purpose and likely effects’ of the treatment.
Section 57: treatment requiring consent and a second opinion
This section applies to the following forms of serious, rare treatment:
- ‘any surgical operation for destroying brain tissue or for destroying the functioning of brain tissue’ (s57(1)) (‘neurosurgery’ or ‘psychosurgery’); and
- ‘the surgical implantation of hormones for the purposes of reducing male sex drive’ (reg 27(1) Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) Regulations 2008).
It requires the following for treatment to be lawful:
- The patient consents (s57(2)); and
- The patient’s consent and capacity to consent is certified in writing by a SOAD and two other appointed people (s57(2)(a); and
- The SOAD certifies in writing that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given (s57(2)(b)).
It applies to all patients whether subject to the MHA or not (s56(1)).
Section 58: treatment requiring consent or a second opinion
This section applies to the following treatment:
- The administration of medication when three months have passed during the current detention since its first administration (s58(1)(b).
- Note that it no longer applies to Electro-convulsive Therapy (ECT) (see s58A instead).
It requires that:
- The patient consents, and the AC or SOAD has certified that he consents and has capacity to consent (s58(3)(a)); or
- A SOAD certifies that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given despite either the patient (a) refusing to consent or (b) lacking capacity to consent.
It applies only to those patients listed at #Patients to whom Part 4 applies above.
Section 58A: electro-convulsive therapy
Section 58A section applies to ECT (s58A(1)(a)) and the administration of medicine as part of ECT (s58A(1)(b) MHA 1983; reg 27(3) Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) Regulations 2008)). Its additional safeguards were inserted by the Mental Health Act 2007.
Before the MHA 2007, ECT was governed by s58: a patient with capacity could be given ECT with consent; a patient lacking capacity, or a refusing capacitous patient, could be given ECT with SOAD approval. The change took effect on 3/11/08.
The current position is as follows (where capacity is shorthand for the question of whether the patient is ‘capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment’):
- If a capacitous adult consents, the AC in charge of treatment or a SOAD must certify that he has capacity and consents (s58A(3)).
- If a capacitous child (under 18) consents, a SOAD must certify that he has capacity and consents, and that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given (s58A(4)). This applies even to informal children (s58A(7)).
- If a patient lacks capacity a SOAD must certify that he lacks capacity, and that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given, and that the treatment would not conflict with an advance decision or decision of a donee, deputy or Court of Protection (s58A(5)).
In emergency situations ECT in the absence of the safeguards under s62, but only in two of the four situations mentioned in that section, namely for treatment:
- which is immediately necessary to save the patient’s life; or
- which (not being irreversible) is immediately necessary to prevent a serious deterioration of his condition.
Section 62: urgent treatment
The four possible types of urgent treatment are treatment (s62(1)):
(a) which is immediately necessary to save the patient’s life; or
(b) which (not being irreversible) is immediately necessary to prevent a serious deterioration of his condition; or
(c) which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is immediately necessary to alleviate serious suffering by the patient; or
(d) which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is immediately necessary and represents the minimum interference necessary to prevent the patient from behaving violently or being a danger to himself or to others.
If any of (a)-(d) apply then the safeguards in s57 and s58 are disapplied. If either (a) or (b) apply then the safeguards in s58A are disapplied.
If an existing authority to treat expires (e.g. the patient ceases to consent or loses capacity, or while waiting for a SOAD for medication at the three-month point) then treatment can continue if the AC ‘considers that the discontinuance of the treatment or of treatment under the plan would cause serious suffering to the patient’ (s62(2)).
Part 4A
The ‘Consent to Treatment’ provisions which apply during the CTO are found in Part 4A (s64A-K).
For details, see
- Reference Guide chapter 24 (Medical treatment of Supervised Community Treatment patients (Part 4A))
- Code of Practice chapters 24 (Medical treatment) and 25 (Treatments subject to special rules and procedures).
- Mental Health Act Manual.
Overview of Part 4A
Part 4A was inserted by the MHA 2007 with effect from 3/11/08 to govern the administration of treatment to those subject to Community Treatment Orders. The provisions are notoriously complicated. The Part is entitled ‘Treatment of Community Patients Not Recalled to Hospital’ and its sections are as follows:
- s64A - Meaning of ‘relevant treatment’
- s64B - Adult community patients
- s64C - Section 64B: supplemental
- s64D - Adult community patients lacking capacity
- s64E - Child community patients
- s64F - Child community patients lacking competence
- s64G - Emergency treatment for patients lacking capacity or competence
- s64H - Certificates: supplementary provisions
- s64I - Liability for negligence
- s64J - Factors to be considered in determining whether patient objects to treatment
- s64K - Interpretation of Part 4A
Adults
The provisions for adults apply to those who are 16 or above. There are two prerequisites for treatment to be given: ‘authority’ and (for medication or ECT) a ‘certificate requirement’ (s64B(2)).
There is ‘authority’ if there is any of the following (s64C(1)):
- Consent from a capacitous patient.
- Consent from a donee, deputy or Court of Protection.
- Authority under s64D (adults lacking capacity). This requires that the clinician (1) has taken reasonable steps are taken to establish whether the patient (P) has capacity; (2) reasonably believes P lacks capacity; (3) has no reason to believe P objects or has reason to believe P objects but there is no need to use force; (4) he is the AC in charge of treatment, or treatment is given under that clinician’s direction; (5) treatment does not conflict with an advance decision or decision of a done, deputy or Court of Protection.
- Authority under s64G (emergency). This requires that (1) the clinician reasonably believes that P lacks capacity or competence; (2) treatment is immediately necessary (as defined); (3) if it is necessary to use force then either treatment is to prevent harm to the patient or force is a proportionate response to the likelihood of the patient suffering harm and to the seriousness of that harm.
The ‘certificate requirement’ is met where:
- A SOAD certifies that it is appropriate for treatment to be given, and that any conditions his certificate specifies are met (s64C(4)); or
- The AC in charge of the treatment has certified in writing that the patient has capacity to consent to the treatment and has consented to it (s64C(4A) with effect from 1/6/12 – except for ECT for under 18s (s64C(4B)).
The certificate requirement does not apply in any of the following cases:
- The treatment is given under s64G (emergency) (s64B(3)(a)).
- The treatment is immediately necessary (as defined in s64C(5)-(8)) and there is consent from a capacitous patient or a donee or deputy or the Court of Protection (s64B(3)(b)).
- The administration of medication during the first month of the CTO (s64B(4)) or during the first three of months of its administration under a Part 4 certificate.
Children
The separate provisions for child community provisions are found in ss64E-64G and apply to those who have not yet reached 16 years of age. Again, the two prerequisites are ‘authority and the ‘certificate requirement’ (64E(2)).
There is authority if (s64E(6)) there is:
- Consent from a competent child.
- Authority under s64F (children lacking competence). This has the same requirements as s64D (adults lacking capacity) with ‘capacity’ replaced by ‘competence’.
- Authority under s64G (emergency) as described above.
The certificate requirement is the same as for adults (s64E(7)).
The certificate requirement does not apply in the following cases:
- (As with adults) treatment is given under s64G (emergency) (s64E(3)(a)).
- The treatment is immediately necessary and there is consent from a competent patient (s64E(3)(b)).
- (As with adults) the administration of medication during the first month of the CTO (s64B(4)) or during the first three of months of its administration under a Part 4 certificate.
Treatment following recall or revocation
A community patient can be recalled for up to 72 hours (s17E) during which the CTO may be revoked (s17F). Treatment for such patients is governed by Part 4 as applied by s62A. Jones describes this as a ‘complex section’ and it is worth reading in the original.
If a Part 4 certificate was in existence before the CTO then this still is valid; however, following Code of Practice para 25.85, it is good practice to obtain a fresh certificate.
The three-month period for medication (following which the s58 safeguards apply) continues to run during the CTO (s62A(2)).
There is no requirement for a Part 4 certificate for s58 treatment (medication) if (s62(3)):
- the Part 4A certificate requirement is met* (under s64C or s64E); or
- no Part 4A certificate would have been required had the patient not been recalled, i.e. it is less than a month since the CTO began (s64B(4), s64E(4)).
There is no requirement for a Part 4 certificate for s58A treatment (ECT) if there is authority to treat, and the certificate requirement is met,* for the purposes of s64C or s64E (s62A(4)).
* For the certificate requirement to be met for these purposes:
- the Part 4A certificate must (if given by a SOAD rather than the AC in charge of the treatment) expressly provide for the treatment to be given on recall (s62A(5)(a)); or
- if the regulatory authority has ordered under s64H(5) that treatment cease, treatment can only be continued within the terms of s64H(8) (i.e. discontinuance pending compliance with the relevant safeguards would cause serious suffering) (s62A(5)(b)).
The two requirement above do not preclude the continuation of treatment pending compliance with s58 or s58A if discontinuance would cause serious suffering (s62A(6)).
When a patient has been revoked, the ability to continue treatment during what would have been the first month of the CTO (see above) only applies pending compliance with s58 (s62A(7)).
The urgent treatment provisions in s62 apply.
Other compulsory treatment considerations
As described above, the requirements of Part 4 or Part 4A must be met.
- The treatment must not breach the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 3 (prohibition of torture) requires that treatment be a ‘medical necessity’ and not reach a ‘minimum level of severity’; Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) requires that treatment must be ‘in accordance with the law’ and proportionate (Herczegfalvy v Austria (application no 10533/83) (1993) 15 EHRR 437, R (N) v Dr M [2002] EWHC 1911 (Admin) M ; Article 8(2)).
- The treatment must also be in the patient’s best interests (R (B) v Dr SS [2006] EWCA Civ 28 M ). Normally the legal term ‘best interests’ only applies to incapacitous patients but here it applies to all patients (R (PS) v Dr G [2003] EWHC 2335 (Admin) M ).
It is possible to seek judicial review of a decision to impose compulsory treatment but no such challenge has been successful. Where the real issue is whether the patient should be detained, the appropriate forum is the Mental Health Tribunal. The Tribunal is not the proper forum for consideration of consent to treatment issues (SH v Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust [2012] UKUT 290 (AAC) M , [2012] MHLO 143).
As compulsory treatment is possible automatically as a result of detention, it has been argued that the consent to treatment provisions may breach the ECHR (see X v Finland 34806/04 [2012] ECHR 1371 M , [2012] MHLO 128).
- Representation
- The role of the mental health lawyer
- Ethical and other conduct guidance for lawyers
- Case preparation
- Section 2: admission for assessment
- Section 3: admission for treatment
- Section 4: emergency admission for assessment
- Section 5: holding powers
- Section 7: guardianship
- Community Treatment Order
- Section 37: hospital order
- Section 37/41: hospital order with restrictions
- Sections 47, 48 and 49: transferred prisoners
- Notional s37
- Section 45A: hospital direction
- Section 38: interim hospital order
- Section 135: Warrant to search for and remove patients
- Section 136: Mentally disordered persons found in public places
- Section 35: Remand to hospital for report on accused’s mental condition
- Section 36: Remand of accused person to hospital for treatment
- Section 37: guardianship order
- Section 43: committal by magistrates for restriction order
- Section 44: committal to hospital under s43
- Section 51(5): hospital order without conviction
- Detention under insanity legislation
- Admission order
- Patients who are eligible for aftercare
- The aftercare duty and its duration
- The definition of aftercare
- Charging for aftercare services
- Which authority pays for aftercare
- Ordinary residence .
- Tribunal Rules
- Preliminary legal points
- Standard and burden of proof (MHT)
- Delay (MHT)
- Re-sectioning after tribunal discharge
- Eligibility periods
- Change in status during tribunal proceedings
- Overriding objective (MHT)
- Applications (MHT)
- Parties (MHT)
- Representatives (MHT)
- Notice of proceedings, and listing (MHT)
- Medical examination (MHT)
- Remote hearings (MHT)
- Disposal without hearing (MHT)
- Hearing in a party’s absence (MHT)
- Decisions by a single judge (MHT)
- Reports (MHT)
- Evidence (MHT)
- Non-disclosure of documents and information (MHT)
- Directions (MHT)
- Adjournment and postponement (MHT)
- Withdrawal (MHT)
- Reinstatement (MHT)
- Decisions (MHT)
- Public hearing (MHT)
- Wasted costs (MHT)
- Patients who have a nearest relative
- Identification of nearest relative
- Nearest relative powers
- Nearest relative powers - introduction
- Nearest relative's right to receive information
- Right to apply to Tribunal
- Right to be consulted and to object to s3 admission
- Right to discharge from guardianship
- Right to request discharge of s2 or s3 or CTO
- Dangerousness criterion
- Delegation by existing nearest relative
- Displacement (appointment) by county court
- Contracts
- Standard Civil Contract 2014
- Standard Civil Contract 2018
- Standard Civil Contract 2024
- Certificated (licenced) work
- Controlled work
- Merits tests
- Means testing
- The mental health fee scheme
- Hourly rates and fixed fees
- Escape fee cases
- Legal Aid for appeals
- Disbursements, including independent experts
- Peer review
- Transaction criteria
- Legal Aid in the Court of Protection
- Legal Aid Agency Liverpool Office
- Legal Aid forms
- Legal Aid guidance documents
- Legal Aid information archive
- Legal Aid News archive
- Non-means-tested non-tribunal matters
- Residence test
- The ECHR and mental health law
- The CRPD and mental health law
- Changes made by MHA 2007
- 16- or 17-year-old with capacity cannot be detained on basis of parental consent
- Abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct is only a consideration for learning disability (not personality disorder)
- Additional safeguards for ECT introduced in new s58A
- Appropriate treatment test replaces treatability test and applies to all patients under long-term detention
- Approved Mental Health Professional replaces Approved Social Worker
- Automatic reference scheme under s68 changed
- Bournewood gap bridged by Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards inserted into MCA 2005
- Civil partners are treated as if married when determining nearest relative
- Conditionally-discharged hospital direction patients can be absolutely discharged by MHRT
- Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004 applies to unrestricted criminal patients
- Fundamental principles set out in Act and included in Code of Practice
- Higher penalties for offences under Act
- Hospital direction patients can no longer apply to Tribunal during first six months
- Hospital directions under s45A apply to any mental disorder
- Legal status of Code of Practice set out in Act
- Limitation to the exceptions to the duty to instruct IMCA
- Mental disorder no longer split into separate classifications
- Minor drafting error in MCA 2005 corrected
- New cross-border arrangements for leave and transfer
- New definition of medical treatment
- New Independent Mental Health Advocate scheme
- New procedure for renewal of detention
- New regulations on conflicts of interest
- New requirements for age-appropriate accommodation for children
- NHS Foundation Trusts discharge power problem remedied
- Organisation of Mental Health Review Tribunal changed
- Patient can apply to displace nearest relative, who can now be displaced on grounds of unsuitability
- Patients can be transferred between places of safety under s135 and s136
- Procedure for making of instruments by Welsh Ministers set out
- Reference to Local Health Boards inserted into Act
- Responsible Clinician/Approved Clinician replaces Responsible Medical Officer
- Restriction orders can no longer be time-limited
- SOAD certificate becomes invalid when patient loses or gains capacity
- Some exclusions to definition of mental disorder have been removed
- Supervised Community Treatment replaces Supervised Discharge
- Transitional provisions until full implementation of MHA 2007
- Treatment while under SCT is covered by new Part 4A
- Coronavirus resources
- Court of Protection and coronavirus
- Legal Aid and coronavirus
- Mental capacity and coronavirus
- Mental Health Tribunal and coronavirus
- MHRT for Wales and coronavirus
- MHT for Scotland and coronavirus
- Remote assessments and coronavirus
- Court of Protection
- Hospital Managers' Hearing
- House of Lords
- Inquests
- Mental Health Review Tribunal
- Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales
- Mental Health Tribunal
- Parole Board
- Upper Tribunal
- Court of Protection forms
- Judicial review forms
- Mental Health Act 1983 Statutory Forms
- Tribunal forms
- Children and mental health law
- Civil restraint order
- Complaints procedure
- Consultations
- Electronic signatures
- Euthanasia and assisted suicide
- Ian Brady
- Independent investigations
- Jury service
- Leave of absence
- Mental disorder and driving
- Ministry of Justice
- Miscellaneous external links
- Murder
- Newsletters
- Nuisance or disturbance on hospital premises
- Power to specify hospital units
- Public tribunal hearings
- Repatriation
- Reports to Prevent Future Deaths
- Smoking
- Summary of routes to discharge
- Summary of types of detention
- Transfer
- Victims of crime
- Victims' rights to make representations and receive information
- Voting rights for detained patients
- Welfare benefits
- Glossary
- Key sources of information
- Other glossary pages
- Adult Social Care
- Advance decision
- Application of MHA 1983 to Armed Forces
- Barring order
- Brief glossary
- British National Formulary
- Care Programme Approach
- Compulsory treatment
- Displacement proceedings
- Enduring Power of Attorney
- Extra-statutory recommendations
- Guardianship
- High secure hospital
- Home Office Circulars
- IPP
- Judicial review
- Judicial review pre-action protocol
- Lasting Power of Attorney
- Learning disability
- Mental disorder
- Part 36
- Prison law
- Recall
- Recommendations
- Responsible authority
- Sexual Harm Prevention Order
- Appropriate adult
- Approved Mental Health Professional
- Approved Social Worker
- Independent Mental Capacity Advocate service
- Independent Mental Health Advocate service
- Responsible Clinician
- Responsible Medical Officer
- Second Opinion Appointed Doctor
- All types of detention
- Summary of the detaining sections
- Deferred discharge
- Deferred discharge of unrestricted patient
- Full discharge of unrestricted patient
- Summary of types of discharge
- Supervised discharge
- Restricted patient
- Technical lifer status
- Unrestricted patient
- Mental Health Act 2007 Overview
- Mental Health Act 1983 Overview
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 Overview
- Mental Health Act 2007 in force dates
- Capacity to consent to sexual relations
- Court of Protection Practice Directions
- Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards
- Interface between MHA and MCA
- Liberty Protection Safeguards
- Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council
- All Party Parliamentary Group on Legal Aid
- Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales
- Care Services Improvement Partnership
- Civil Contracts Consultative Group
- Commission for Social Care Inspection
- Community Care (company)
- Court of Protection User Group
- Crown Prosecution Service
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Essex Mental Health Independent Inquiry
- European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
- Family Law Week
- Fixated Threat Assessment Centre
- General Medical Council
- Gov.uk website
- Health Professions Council
- Healthcare Commission
- Healthcare Inspectorate Wales
- House of Lords Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- HUDOC
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
- International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law
- Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Health Bill
- Judiciary
- Law Commission
- Legal Ombudsman
- Legislation.gov.uk
- MAPPA
- Mental Health Act Commission
- Mental Health Lawyers Association
- National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health
- National Mental Health Development Unit
- National Policing Improvement Agency
- Office of Fair Trading
- Office of Public Sector Information
- Office of the Public Guardian
- Official Solicitor
- PPMHG
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Solicitors Regulation Authority
- Statute Law Database
- Tribunal Procedure Committee
- Venice Commission
- Care Quality Commission pages
- Care Quality Commission
- CQC - DOLS reports
- CQC - MHA reports
- CQC - Other links
- CQC - State of Care reports
- CQC - Surveys
- Bailii
- Incorporated Council of Law Reporting
- Inquest (Charity)
- Mind (Charity)
- Rethink Mental Illness
- Social Care Institute for Excellence
- Northern Ireland
- Mental health law in Northern Ireland
- Review Tribunal (Northern Ireland)
- Mental health law in Scotland
- Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland
- Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland
- Mental health law in Southern Ireland
- Mental health law in Wales
- Welsh Assembly emails archive (2010-2012)
- Consent to treatment provisions
- Covert administration of medication
- Definition of mental disorder
- Dual diagnosis
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies
- Insight
- Psychiatric information
- Psychiatric medication
- Psychopathic disorder
- Treatability test
- Statistics - Ethnicity
- Statistics - Ministry of Justice
- Statistics - Miscellaneous
- Statistics - NHS Digital - Detention and CTO
- Statistics - NHS Digital - DOLS
- Statistics - NHS Digital - Guardianship
- Statistics - NHS Digital - Other
- Statistics - Tribunal
- Statistics - Welsh Assembly Government
- Law Society
- Law Society mental capacity (welfare) accreditation scheme
- Law Society mental health accreditation scheme
- Law Society mental health accreditation scheme - CPD requirements
- Law Society mental health accreditation scheme - guidance documents
- CPD scheme
- Email updates
- Online forum
- Subscriptions
What links here:
- No pages link to this page